I got up and out early today and headed to Valley Forge Park with both my Nikon N80 35mm SLR film camera and my Canon Rebel T3 DSLR.
![]() | ||||
| Nikon N80 Circa 2006 (Stock Photo) |
![]() |
| Canon Rebel T3/1100D 2014 (Stock Photo) |
Now I realize that I could save money by purchasing film online and sending the film out for development. But I am trying to compare digital photography with film based on the fasted possible turnaround. The local lab I use is 1 hour which is rare nowadays. At least around here. On top of the hour it takes to receive my photos there is also time involved to scan each photo I want to use online.
Okay, money and time aside what really matters is results. here are similar photos from each camera. I shot these at Valley Forge this morning. Each is presented after post processing in Photoshop. Take a look.
![]() | |||
| Nikon N80 35mm SLR Using Kodak Ultramax 400 Speed Film |
![]() | |
| Canon Rebel T3 DSLR Using 100 Film Speed Equivalent |
![]() |
| Nikon N80 35mm SLR Using Kodak Ultramax 400 Speed Film |
![]() | |
| Canon Rebel T3 DSLR Using 200 Film Speed Equivalent |
![]() |
| Nikon N80 35mm SLR Using Kodak Ultramax 400 Speed Film |
![]() |
| Canon Rebel T3 DSLR Using 100 Film Speed Equivalent |
What are your thoughts? To me there is no clear winner based on quality. First of all comes the film. I had Kodak 400 speed film on hand and was not going to spend money on more. I would have preferred 100 speed to help with the bright sunshine. Second I had no control over the developing of the film. When I shoot digital I generally save my images in RAW format so in a sense I actually control how the photo comes out even before processing in Photoshop. The machines used for film at any local lab use a default setting to get "average" results. And third when I shoot with film I can't check to see how an image looks and adjust accordingly to get a better result.
All I can really say is that I am so glad I grew up with film. Now, I am by no means a pro photographer and don't claim to be. I am continually learning. That is what makes it fun. I can't imagine "knowing it all" and having nothing new to look forward to learning. I do however think that film made be a better photographer than if I learned strictly on digital. I am usually (but not always) more careful in composing a shot. But the big difference with digital is that after composing I can shoot using different settings such as a larger or smaller aperture or perhaps a different film speed. I also bracket a lot more now than I used to. I do this because it is now "free" to do so.
How about you? Are you all digital or a film purist? Or are you like me and use digital 99% of the time but every now and then shoot film for the sake of nostalgia and for a reminder of why digital is so great?
Thanks as always for your time and I do hope you come back soon. I should have my "Photo Of The Day" posted a little later in the day.
Until next time...








